Kamdeo Choudhary @ Kamdeo Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70235 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2024 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.
Kamdeo Choudhary @ Kamdeo Chauhan S/O Mokhtar Choudhary R/O Vill.- Manjhauliya, P.S.- Amas, Dist.- Gaya (Bihar) At Present Residing AtNathun Chauhan Market, Saraswati Mohalla, Near Block-K, P.S.- Madanpur, Dist.- Aurangabad (Bihar) 2.
Dharampal Choudhary @ Dharampal Chauhan S/O Mokhtar Choudhary R/O Vill.- Manjhauliya, P.S.- Amas, Dist.- Gaya (Bihar) At Present Residing At- Nathun Chauhan Market, Saraswati Mohalla, Near Block-K, P.S.- Madanpur, Dist.- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Patna 2.
Doman Chaudhary, Son of late Nathun Chaudhay Resident of villageManjhauliya PS- Amas, Dist- Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aman Vishal For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-03-2026 Seen the office notes.
2. The service of notice is treated as valid because the same has been received by the son of the O.P. No. 2.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
4. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 248 of 2024 registered for offences under Sections 341, 323, 420, 406, 467, 468, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70235 of 2025(4) dt.09-03-2026 2/2 petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any offence. He further submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably and the petitioner is ready to return the entire defalcated amount to the informant.
6. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
7. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners, this application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to move the Court below for grant of anticipatory bail. In the event the petitioners are able to satisfy the Court below, on the basis of the compromise and the payment made pursuant thereto, in light of Annexure-2 and other relevant documents, and after hearing the informant, the petitioners shall be released on bail. However, if the petitioners fail to satisfy the Court below in this regard, the Court below shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T