Ramudgar Verma @ Ramadhar Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63285 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2019 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Ramudgar Verma @ Ramadhar Verma S/o Ram Partap Verma Resident of Village- Hemanpur- tola ward- 12 Mohanpur, P.S.- Bakhri, DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajiv Nayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 24-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for State.

The petitioner in this case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Bakhari P.S. Case No.110 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308, 379 and 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant had come to the house of the petitioner where his nephew (sister's son) had come and the informant had indulged in quarrel with him in course of which the alleged occurrence has taken place and in the same a simple injury seems to have been caused, but the place of occurrence being house of this petitioner and the informant is the aggressor, his prayer for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63285 of 2019(3) dt.24-01-2020 2/2 anticipatory bail be considered.

Learned APP for the State is present and has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein it appears that the petitioner had assaulted the informant on his head which has caused injury, though simple in nature, but thereafter his wife was also assaulted and she has also received some injuries, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In case, the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, the aforesaid submission of the petitioner shall be considered for purpose of regular bail and an appropriate order thereon shall be passed by the court below without being prejudiced by the order of this Court and the prayer for regular bail shall not be rejected only because this Court has not granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

This application stands disposed of.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T