Vinod Yadav @ Vinod Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68482 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2022 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
VINOD YADAV @ VINOD KUMAR YADAV S/o Chandrapal Yadav R/vKauriya, Yadav Tola, Kauriya P.S. Madhuban, District- East Champaran, Bihar 2.
BITTU KUMAR @ MANISH KUMAR S/o Vinod Yadav @ Vinod Kumar Yadav R/v- Kauriya, Yadav Tola, Kauriya P.S. Madhuban, District- East Champaran, Bihar 3.
TUTTU KUMAR @ RANJAN KUMAR S/o Vinod Yadav @ Vinod Kumar Yadav R/v- Kauriya, Yadav Tola, Kauriya P.S. Madhuban, District- East Champaran, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Shahnawaz Ali For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-02-2023 Heard the parties.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 302 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioners is that they alongwith other co-accused persons abused and assaulted the informant's side by means of several weapons due to which they sustained several injuries. The husband of the informant was taken to hospital where he was declared dead.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68482 of 2022(3) dt.06-02-2023 2/2 They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The specific allegation is against the co-accused Braj Mohan Yadav, Namod Kumar Yadav and Ajit Kumar. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.01.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.66626 of 2022. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No.202 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T