Ranjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2186 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2015 Thana- MANER District- Patna ====================================================== Ranjay Kumar, son of Vijay Rai, Resident of Village - Singhara, P.S.- Maner, District- patna ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Jai Narain Thakur (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier thrice rejected vide order dated 30.11.2015, 03.03.2017 and 06.09.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. 47233 of 2015, Cr. Misc. No. 53553 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 39693 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 16.07.2015, there is no legal and cogent material against him, confessional statement made before the police has got no evidentiary value in the eye of law, up till now only three prosecution witness have been examined and they have not named the petitioner. There was direction to conclude the trial within a period of three months but the trial has not been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2186 of 2018(4) dt.21-02-2018 2/2 concluded and in near future it is not likely to be concluded and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that trial has not been concluded.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-VI, Danapur, District- Patna, in connection with S. Tr. No. 525 of 2016 arising out of Maner P.S. Case No. 290 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T