← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4001/2019disposed

Veena Kumari @ Bina Kumari, v. Pankaj Kumar Pal,

2024-01-11Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4001 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2076 of 2019 ====================================================== Veena Kumari @ Bina Kumari, Wife of Binod Kumar Singh, R/villageParmanandpur, P.S.- Pratapganj, Distt- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

Pankaj Kumar Pal, Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supply Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Mahendra Kumar, the District Magistrate, Supaul. 3.

Subhash Kumar, Sub-Divisional Officer, Birpur, Supaul. 4.

Surendra Kumar, Block Supply Officer, Raghopur, Supaul. 5.

Sabana Khatoon, D/O - Md. Ilyas, Wife of Md. Noor Islam, Resident of Village Adraha, P.S. Pratapganj, Supaul.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-01-2024 No one appears for the petitioner.

2. Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, learned AAG-5 appears for the State and submits that the order has already been complied with vide Annexure 'A' to the show cause filed on behalf of O.P. Nos. 2 and 3.

3. On the record, there is a rejoinder to the show cause in which the petitioner has pleaded that the order passed by the Collector, Supaul did not consider certain materials produced by the petitioner and it is bad in law.

4. This Court is of the considered opinion that in case

Patna High Court MJC No.4001 of 2019(3) dt.11-01-2024 2/2 the petitioner is aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order of the Collector, Supaul, she may seek her remedy against that order in appropriate forum.

5. This contempt application is disposed of.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U