Satyam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71808 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-152 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Satyam Kumar Son of Vijay Prasad Resident of Village - Parwati, P.S.- Shahpur, District - Nawada.

2.

Amrita Kumari Daughter of Vijay Prasad Resident of Village - Parwati, P.S.- Shahpur, District - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Nawada Town P. S. Case No. 152 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per prosecution case, son of informant, namely Jahangir, was in love affair with petitioner no. 2 and it is alleged that on 04.02.2025, petitioner no. 2 called the son of informant to take her sister, namely Chhoti Kumari, for examination and thereafter, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, killed the son of informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71808 of 2025(6) dt.05-02-2026 2/2

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they, along with other accused persons, killed the son of informant. During course of investigation, sufficient material evidence has come to suggest that all the accused persons, including these petitioners, killed the deceased. In the post mortem report, the cause of death is Asphyxia due to hyoid bone fracture.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, gravity of offence and materials that have surfaced during course of investigation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T