Jitendra Mahto @ Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67985 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2333 Year-2024 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur ====================================================== Jitendra Mahto @ Jitendra Kumar S/O Late Yogendra Mahto R/O VillageGangapur, P.S.- Musrigharari, Dist.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Bebi Kumari W/O Jitendra Mahto @ Jitendra Kumar, D/O Raj Kumar Mahto R/O Village- Gangapur, P.S.- Musrigharari, Dist.- Samastipur. AT PRESENT R/O Village- Dadhiya belar, P.S.- Karpoorigram, Dist.- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mahendra Pratap, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP Mr.Surya Nr. Roy, Adv.for OP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 115(2), 85, 109, 316(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and later on Section 85 of the B.N.S. was added.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and for this, the petitioner offered to pay Rs. 1,50,000/- (Rupees one lakh fifty thousand) in two installments, as full and final settlement

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67985 of 2025(4) dt.22-06-2026 2/3 amount and opposite party no. 2 has accepted the offer and gave her consent.

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute and confirms the fact regarding settlement entered into between the parties.

5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator's report.

6. Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has been resolved, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate - III, Samastipur / concerned Court, in connection with Complaint Case No. 2333 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67985 of 2025(4) dt.22-06-2026 3/3 petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of Agreement, failing which, learned Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioner.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U