Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60848/2018bail granted

Pardhuman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-10Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60848 of 2018 (2) dt.10-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60848 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -61 Year- 2018 Thana -DANAPUR RAIL P.S. District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Pardhuman Kumar, S/o Jitendra Giri @ Jitan Giri, Resident of VillageSri Rampur, P.O.- Mohauddinpur, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-10-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Special Case No. 6310 of 2018 arising out of Rail Danapur P.S. Case No. 61/18, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 16. 2 litres of illegal wine. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 10.07.2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60848 of 2018 (2) dt.10-10-2018 to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna in connection with Special Case No. 6310 of 2018 arising out of Rail Danapur P.S. Case No. 61/18, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T