← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68105/2025bail granted

Manik Sharma @ Manik Chand Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-13Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68105 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2025 Thana- KADWA District- Katihar ====================================================== Manik Sharma @ Manik Chand Sharma S/o Sadanand Sharma R/o VillageMohna, P.O.- Chauki Haripur, P.S.- Kadwa, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Radha Mohan Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-10-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 191(2), 192(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 329(4) and 352 of BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of a dispute relating to past elopment, seven named accused came on 26.05.2025 at 10:00 A.M. and Sukradeo and Manik assaulted Sanjha Devi by kudal causing injury on head. It is further alleged that petitioner eloped and married the wife of his younger brother.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that informant in his statement

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68105 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 2/2 recorded u/s 180 B.N.S. stated that Sukradeo Sharma assaulted Sanjha Devi and his mother as has been specifically pleaded at para-7 and 8 of the anticipatory bail application. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence. It is next submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kadwa P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) pallavi/- U T