Amit Kumar Yadav @ Amit Yadav @ Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1519 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2022 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== AMIT KUMAR YADAV @ AMIT YADAV @ AMIT KUMAR Son of Rambadan Yadav, Resident of Village- Chhitraur, Ward No.-15, P.S.- Matihani, District- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-04-2023 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 425 of 2022, registered for offence punishable under sections 8, 20(b), (ii) (C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

As per allegation, three accused persons were fleeing away from a vehicle, but on chase, two persons including the petitioner were arrested and one became successful in fleeing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1519 of 2023(3) dt.03-04-2023 2/2 away. 29.540 grams of Ganja was recovered from that car. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Tempo of the petitioner met an accident on that day and he was passing through that place and merely on the basis of suspicion, he has been arrayed as accused in the present case. On the other hand, the learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that more than commercial quantity Ganja was recovered from a vehicle whereby the petitioner was travelling along with other co-accused persons. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the bail petition of the petitioner stands rejected with the observation that if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months, he may renew his prayer for bail. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T