Lalan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70962 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2023 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Lalan Yadav Son Of Late Bhopal Yadav R/O Village- Chukti P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Parmatma Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 07-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 100 of 2023 arising out of G.R. No. 1045 of 2023 lodged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 387, 354, 504, 506 & 34 of the I.P.C.
3. As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against 2 named and 8-10 unknown accused persons against whom the allegation of demand of ransom, causing assault and threaten to kill are there.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner along with 8-10 associates reached at the shop of the informant and directed to close. It has also been alleged that they have misbehaved with the female members and the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70962 of 2023(2) dt.07-11-2023 2/2 surrounding families of the locality and threaten by their arms.
5. Counsel submits that there is no specific allegation made in the F.I.R.. He submits that petitioner is in custody 03.07.2023. He further submits that there are 21 criminal cases pending against the petitioner and out of 21 cases, petitioner has been acquitted in 9 cases and in rest cases, he is on bail.
6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean and at the time of hearing bail application, this aspect must be taken into consideration.
7. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
8. However, liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T