← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66130/2019bail granted

Sunny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-14Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66130 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2019 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== SUNNY KUMAR, Male, aged about 28 years, Son of Late Lakshman Prasad, Resident of Village - Belhauri, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, Distt - Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Md. Matloob Rab, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence registered under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 379 and 411 of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that during the course of checking, the police seized the vehicle of the petitioner. He disclosed that the said vehicle was purchased from Arvind Kumar and Indrajeet Kumar of Mahindra Finance Company, Saguna More, Patna in the year 2015 and the documents have been supplied by them. On verification, it was found that the Registration No. BR-29PA.5999 belongs to Fortuner vehicle which is in the name of Dr. Rajnandan Singh of Siwan and accordingly it is alleged that the vehicle is apparently

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66130 of 2019(3) dt.14-11-2019 2/2 stolen one.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 08.06.2019. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. The petitioner has been made accused in the present case due to mistake of fact. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is said to be the bonafide purchaser of the vehicle in question. He had no knowledge that the documents of the vehicle were fake documents.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Danapur at Patna, in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 148 of 2019.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T