← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73845/2024bail rejected

Golu Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-22Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73845 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2024 Thana- AGIAON BAZAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Golu Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeet Kumar Son of Badan Yadav Vill - Kukraha, Bhojpur, PS- Agiaon Bajar, District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvnendra Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Agiaon Bajar P.S. Case No. 61 of 2024 for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act lodged on 04.05.2024 by the informant, Dabloo Kumar.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while he was returning on his motorcycle to home, the named accused persons stopped his vehicle. There was a quarrel whereafter allegation against this petitioner is of using pistol and opened fire which entered the stomach of the informant. He ran toward the ditch but was again fired which however did not hit him. He was rushed to Arvindo Hospital and then the FIR.

4. Though learned counsel for the petitioner tried to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73845 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 2/2 impress upon this Court regarding the innocence submitting that he was in Delhi at the time of occurrence, learned APP submits that specific allegation is against this petitioner that he opened fire causing injury in the stomach of the petitioner.

5. Considering the allegation that has come against the petitioner coupled with the fact that he has criminal antecedent, no case for bail is made out for the present.

6. The present bail application stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U T