Mahesh Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17027 of 2024 ====================================================== Mahesh Singh Yadav Son of Late Ram Chandra Prasad Yadav, resident of Chiraiyatand, District-Gaya (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar.
2.
The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.
3.
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sadar Gaya, District-Gaya. 4.
The Circle Officer, Town Gaya, District-Gaya. 5.
Badri Prasad, son of Late Sita Kahar, resident of Mohalla-Maranpur, TolaKhataka Chak, P.S.-Civil Lines, District-Gaya. 6.
Dwarika Ram, son of Late Sita Kahar, resident of Mohalla-Maranpur, TolaKhataka Chak, P.S.-Civil Lines, District-Gaya. 7.
Munna Ram @ Munna Prasad Son of Late Sita Kahar, resident of MohallaMaranpur, Tola-Khataka Chak, P.S.-Civil Lines, District-Gaya. 8.
Jeetendra Prasad, son of Late Sita Kahar, resident of Mohalla-Maranpur, Tola-Khataka Chak, P.S.-Civil Lines, District-Gaya. 9.
Suresh Yadav, son of Late Sita Yadav @ Late Yadav, resident of MohallaMaranpur, Tola-Khatakachak, P.S.-Civil Lines, District-Gaya. 10.
Dukhan Yadav @ Dukha Yadav, Son of Late Chingi Yadav, resident of Mohalla-Maranpur, Tola-Khatakachak, P.S.-Civil Lines, District-Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kunal Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Kumar Manish, SC-5 Mr. Prashant Kumar, AC to SC-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-11-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Manish learned SC-5.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing vehemently for some time, seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to avail the relief sought for in the instant writ application in Title Suit No. 268 of 2017 pending before the learned Civil Judge, Gaya.
Patna High Court CWJC No.17027 of 2024(2) dt.12-11-2024 2/2
3. The learned State Counsel has no objection.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U