Lalmohan Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72673 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2024 Thana- ROHTAS District- Rohtas ====================================================== Lalmohan Chaudhari S/o Ram Nath Chaudhari R/o vill - Rasulpur, P.S. - Rohtas, Distt. - Rohtas, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Avinash Chandra For the State :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP Mr. Anuj Kumar Chaudhary, Adv.

For the Informant :

Mr. Rahunandan Kumar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. In compliance with order dated 29.10.2024, the Doctor, who has prepared the injury report, is physically present in this Court, and explained as to why, in the injury report, he had not mentioned the dimension of the injury, later on he mentioned the dimension of the injury.

3. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 341, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons is said to have assaulted the informant's side.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72673 of 2024(3) dt.18-11-2024 2/2 specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that injury sustained by injured person is simple in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

6. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the injury, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Rohtas P.S. Case No. 214 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. The personal appearance of the Doctor shall stand dispensed with.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T