Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68621/2025bail granted

Teena Devi @ Cheena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-24Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68621 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2025 Thana- BADHAILA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Teena Devi @ Cheena Devi Wife of Triloki Ram Resident of Village - Kushdhar, P.S.- Baghaila, District - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Choubey Jawahar , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .

2. The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections Sections 103 (1) and 3 (5) of BNS.

3 . As per the prosecution case , daughter of informant got married to co-accused Bajrangi Kumar on 06.06.2023 and after marriage she went to her matrimonial house . It is further alleged that on 06.02.2025, co-accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68621 of 2025(3) dt.24-11-2025 2/3 Bajrangi Kumar informed the informant that his daughter had died. Upon reaching the matrimonial house, the informant found her lying dead. The informant harbours a strong suspicion that the accused persons have culpably caused the death of his daughter.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is sister-in -law ( gotni ) of deceased. Allegation is general and omnibus against this petitioner. Petitioner is simply victim of over implications. Informant is not an eye witness to the alleged occurrence . As a matter of fact, deceased died a natural death . Petitioner is separate in mess and property and got no concern with the affairs of deceased and her husband. It is further orally submitted that thrust of accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody Petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2025 .

5 . Considering the aforesaid facts, and other circumstances of the case , prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

6. Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68621 of 2025(3) dt.24-11-2025 3/3 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Additional District and Sessions Judge - 10 Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Baghaila Police Station Case No. 21 of 2025 .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T