Laddu Chaudhary @ Laddu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65739 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2018 Thana- RAMNAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== LADDU CHAUDHARY @ LADDU MAHTO, Son of Suresh Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Dihmahui, Police Station- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Rajeev Nayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 118 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing murder of the daughter of the Informant for non fulfillment of demand of dowry along with FIR named accused. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has committed no offence and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence as he had gone outside his village to earn livelihood. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 12.06.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65739 of 2018(2) dt.19-11-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate-Bagaha, West Champaran, in connection with Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 118 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U