← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20033/2019dismissed

M/S Jai Durga Printers And M/S Jai Laxmi Jai Durga Stationary v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-06Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20033 of 2019 ====================================================== M/s Jai Durga Printers and M/s Jai Laxmi Jai Durga Stationary Club Road Aurangabad through its Proprietor Ajay Kumar Sharma (Male, aged about 49 years), S/o Sri Nand Kumar Sharma, resident of near Shiv Mandir, Sri Krishna Nagar, Ward No. 19, P.S. and District Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Collector-cum-District Election Officer (Panchayat), Aurangabad. 5.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer-cum-Deputy Election Officer, (Panchayat), Aurangabad.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Choubey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Archana Meenakshee (GP6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 06-07-2026

1. On 23.06.2026, the Learned counsel for the respondents sought time for seeking instruction from the department to report this Court whether any amount has been paid to the petitioner subsequent to allotment made by the District Magistrate.

2. Accordingly, the Learned counsel for the respondents reported to the Court that she received the instruction that the payment has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.20033 of 2019(3) dt.06-07-2026 2/2 made to the petitioner. The Learned counsel for the petitioner has also assisted the Court on the same fact.

3. In view of the above, nothing remains in the Writ petition for adjudication. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) Aryan/- U