← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64890/2018bail granted

Manoj Verma v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-05Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64890 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -139 Year- 2018 Thana -DURAULI District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Manoj Verma Son of Hari Kishun Verma, Resident of Village- Rampur Saraiya, Police Station- Darauli, District- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey Mr. Sandeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-11-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Darauli P.S.Case No.139 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of dowry death, who happens to be Bhaisur of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the allegation is general and omnibus in nature and nothing has been attributed against him. He is in custody for more than four months.

Heard learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64890 of 2018 (2) dt.05-11-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Siwan, in connection with Darauli P.S.case No.139 of 2018.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T