Pankaj Kumar Gupta @ Pankaj Sah @ Lallu Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71240 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2025 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar Gupta @ Pankaj Sah @ Lallu Sah S/o Binod Sah@ Lalan Sah R/o vill -Gajrajganj, P.S.- Udawantangar, Distt.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Priya Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2),118(1),126(2),109,352,351(2)(3),3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 10.06.2025, he had gone to purchase sweets where Binod was present from before, who started abusing. On protest, his son Bittu and petitioner along with Rohit came and assaulted by rod causing injury on left hand, thereafter Bittu assaulted by rod causing injury below the elbow
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71240 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 2/3 of left hand and petitioner assaulted by rod causing injury on head, thereafter Rohit assaulted by leg.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the date of occurrence is 10.06.2025 and the FIR came to be instituted on 13.06.2025 i.e. after a delay of three days without any plausible explanation, which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is also submitted that the FIR does not even remotely disclose that as to where the injured was treated which further casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is also submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Udawantnagar P. S. Case No.294 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71240 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 3/3 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T