Awadhesh Ray @ Awadesh Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68561 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-419 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Awadhesh Ray @ Awadesh Ray S/o Durga Ray R/o Village - Sandha Bazar Samiti, P.S - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran 2.
Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Ranjan @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar S/o Awadhesh Ray R/o Village - Sandha Bazar Samiti, P.S - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran 3.
Sonu Kumar S/o Awadhesh Ray R/o Village - Sandha Bazar Samiti, P.S - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shyameshwar Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case no.419 of 2025 registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 303, 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S, 2023.
3. The allegations in the F.I.R is that on account of some land dispute with regard to measurement of land, accused persons assaulted the informant and other family members causing injuries to them.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68561 of 2025(2) dt.26-09-2025 2/3 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. Both the parties are neighbours and because of land dispute, the alleged occurrence has taken place. There is case and counter case. The manner of occurrence is other than what has been narrated in the F.I.R and the correct version is stated in the F.I.R. being Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case no.420 of 2025 lodged by petitioner no. 2 against the informant and his family. It is further submitted that there are allegations of assault upon these three petitioners but the same is not on vital part of the body and the injury reports which have been annexed as Annexure-P3 series show that injuries are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and also considering that there is land dispute between the parties and injuries attributable to the petitioners are simple in nature, it is directed that the petitioners above named, having no criminal antecedent in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68561 of 2025(2) dt.26-09-2025 3/3 Case no.419 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T