Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Mangalam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63237 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2018 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Mangalam Son of Arvind Singh, Resident of Village- Khambhar, P.S. Muffasil, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Mufasil P.S. Case No. 290 of 2018 for the offence registered under Section 30 (a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 81 litres of foreign liquor from his Basbitti.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though the liquor has been recovered from the Basbitti but the said Basbitti is situated at a long distance from village and abandoned place and he has been implicated in this case due to village politics.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63237 of 2018(2) dt.26-10-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II cum Special Judge, Bihar Prohibition Excise Act, 2016, Begusarai, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 290 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Veena/ banti/- U T