Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63603/2018bail granted

Sonu Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-25Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63603 of 2018 (2) dt.25-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63603 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -229 Year- 2018 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Sonu Alam Son of Md. Zakir Hussain Resident of Mohalla- Takiya, Police Station- Sasaram (Model), District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Sahani ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with POCSO Case No. 8A/2018, arising out of Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 229/2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 376 (D), 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act.

Allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused is of committing rape on the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case, which will appear from the fact that the statement of girl has been recorded in this case, in which, she has not named the petitioner. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 28.07.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63603 of 2018 (2) dt.25-10-2018 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -I, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with POCSO Case No. 8A/2018, arising out of Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 229/2018, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T