Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65787/2018bail granted

Ramotar Chauhan @ Ramvatar Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-01Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65787 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2018 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ====================================================== Ramotar Chauhan @ Ramvatar Chauhan Son of late Laljee Chauhan Resident of Village- Bhaunour Beldari, P.S. Narhat District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Anil Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 153 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is of assaulting informant's Bhagina with iron rod on his head. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case. It has been further submitted that he has no criminal antecedent and the injury sustained by the petitioner is simple in nature. Petitioner is in custody since 19.08.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65787 of 2018(2) dt.01-11-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., 5th Nawada, in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 153 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T