← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68495/2025bail granted

Kishore Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-08Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68495 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2025 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Kishore Ram S/O Bhola Ram R/O Vill.- Kumaitha, P.s.- Halsi, DistrictLakhisarai 2.

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Ram S/O Prabhu Ram R/O Vill.- Kumaitha, P.s.- Halsi, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mayank Bilochan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Halsi P.S. Case no. 208 of 2025 registered under sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. As per the prosecution case, on information having been received and a raid being conducted, while two persons managed to escape, two accused were taken into custody and 14 litres of country liquor was recovered. The accused who

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68495 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/3 managed to flee away were identified as the two petitioners herein.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case at the instance of their enemies. Neither of them got arrested at the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from their possession. The cause of false implication of the petitioner no. 1 is his antecedent while the petitioner no. 2 has no criminal antecedent. They undertake to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioners in the F.I.R., the petitioners not having been arrested at the spot and no incriminating article having been recovered from their possession, it is directed that both the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Halsi P.S. Case no. 208 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68495 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 3/3 satisfaction of the learned District & Additional Sessions JudgeIV-cum-Special Excise Court-I, Lakhisarai. (Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T