Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68448/2018bail granted

Binod Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-11-30Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.68448 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-739 Year-2011 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE District- Saharsa ====================================================== Binod Ram, son of late Munshi Ram, resident of village, karserua, P.S. Darigaon (Sasaram), District, Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1) State Of Bihar 2) Lawangi Devi, W/o Binod Ram R/o vill- Karsheru, P.S. Darigaon, Distt, Rohtas, Sasaram At present, R/Vill- Naraina, P.S. Chanari, DisttRohtas, Sasaram ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamla Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Complaint Case No. 739/2011 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act.

Complainant is the wife of the petitioner who has alleged torture by the petitioner for non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his antecedent is clean and in in custody since 01.06.2018. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has falsely been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68448 of 2018(2) dt.30-11-2018 2/2 implicated in this case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Complaint Case No. 739/11, Tr. No.432/18 with following conditions:- (1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T