Ran Vijay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64801 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5258 Year-2016 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== RAN VIJAY SINGH Son of Yogendra Singh Resident of Village- Marwan Kshetra, Ghurahu Chapra, P.O. and P.S.- Ramkola, District- Kushi Nagar (Uttar Pradesh).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Priyanka Devi Wife of Ran Vijay Singh, Daughter of Nakha Singh Resident of Village Mauza- Marwan Kshetra, Ghurahu Chapra, P.O. and P.S. - Ramkola, District- Kushi Nagar (U.P.), presently at Mauza Uchakagaon, P.S.- Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.5258 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the complaint case there is allegation against the petitioner of subjecting the complainant, who happens to his wife of cruelty and assault and in spite of intervention she was again tortured.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the allegation is false and concocted and she is a lady of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64801 of 2019(2) dt.16-10-2019 2/2 questionable character.

Heard learned A.P.P. also and from perusal for the record, it appears that the learned court below has taken effort for reconciliation between the parties but the petitioner has rightly refused for the same on the ground that she is a lady of questionable character and as such it appears that there is no chance for reconciliation between the parties. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T