Deepak Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.67296 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -373 Year- 2018 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Deepak Paswan S/o Prabhu Paswan Resident of VillageGajpura,P.S.Motihari Muffasil,Distt.-East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise Case No.373 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation against the petitioner and one other accused is of recovery of 108 litres of countrymade Nepali liquor from the motorcycle which was being ridden by petitioner and one other co-accused person was sitting behind the motorcycle. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 10.08.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67296 of 2018 (2) dt.26-11-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Excise Case No.373 of 2018, with following conditions :-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjeev/- U T