Sampoorna Nand Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.345 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2688 of 2011 ====================================================== Sampoorna Nand Tiwari, Son of Late Chandra Shekhar Tiwari, resident of Chiriya Bazar, Sonepur, P.S.- Sonepur, Police Station- Sonepur, DistrictSaran, presently posted as Lecturer, Government Ayodhya Shiv Kumari Ayurvedic College, Begusarai.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health (Medical Education Family Welfare and Indigenous Medicine), Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health (Medical Education Family Welfare and Indigenous Medicine), Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Department of Health (Medical Education Family Welfare and Indigenous Medicine), Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Director (Indigenous Medicine), Department of Health, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

5. Dr. Mahendra Prasad Singh, Son of presently not known to the petitioner, posted as Reader, Department of Dravyagauna, Government Ayurvedic College, Kadamkuan, Patna- 800 003.

6. Dr. Vijay Shankar Dubey, Son of presently not known to the petitioner, posted as Reader, Department of Dravyagauna, Government Ayurvedic College, Kadamkuan, Patna- 800 003.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ray Saurabh Nath, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL

Patna High Court LPA No.345 of 2017 (15) dt.25-04-2018 2/2 ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 25-04-2018 The materials and evidence which are sought to be brought by filing I.A. No. 2664 of 2018 cannot form the basis for interfering with the order of the learned Single Judge dated 08.09.2016.

I.A. No. 2664 of 2018 is rejected.

If the appellant feels that the learned Single Judge has committed error on the face of record by not considering the pleadings in the supplementary affidavit filed on his behalf with regard to the issue of his promotion, he is free to file the review application before the learned Single Judge.

Appeal stands disposed of with the above liberty. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Devendra/Arjun U