Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67011/2018bail granted

Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-06Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.67011 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2018 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran ======================================================

1. Pappu Yadav Son of Late Radheshyam Yadav R/o Banchahri,P.S. Bagaha,Distt.-West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Bagha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 270 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing theft of tractor of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no specific allegation against petitioner nor he is associate of co-accused Prem Singh and Prem Singh has not disclosed the name of petitioner as his associate. Co-accused Harinarayan Yadav has been granted anticipatory bail by this Hon'ble Court

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67011 of 2018(2) dt.06-11-2018 2/2 vide order dated 09.10.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51947 of 2018. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 24.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 1st, Bagha, West Champaran, in connection with Bagha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 270 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T