Manju Devi @ Manju Kumari And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.4052 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2018 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ======================================================
1. Manju Devi @ Manju Kumari, Wife of Ajay Sao,
2. Ajay Sao, Son of Chandeshwar Sao, Both resident of VillageDakhner, P.S.- Paraiya, District- Gaya. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Prithivi Raj Singh For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the "SC/ST Act") against the refusal of prayer for regular bail vide order dated 29.09.2018 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Gaya in Mufassil Police Station Case No.217 of 2018 registered under Sections 302, 201, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 3(2)(v)(a), 3(2)(v)(b), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Due to love affairs murder of the son of the informant was committed and F.I.R. was lodged after recovery of dead
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4052 of 2018 dt.06-11-2018 2/2 body on suspicion against the named persons including, the appellants.
Considering the fact that only material against the appellants is suspicion, let the appellants, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the condition that the appellants shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the appellants. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) abhishek/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 08.11.2018 Transmission Date 08.11.2018