← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64349/2019disposed

Azaj Alam @ Md. Azaj Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-04Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64349 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1030 Year-2018 Thana- KHAGARIA COMPALINT CASE District- Khagaria ====================================================== AZAJ ALAM @ MD. AZAJ ALAM Son of Md. Abid Hassan Resident of Mohalla-Islam Nagar, Bikhanpur, Gungti No.3, Police Station-Ishak Chak, District-Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Juli Praveen Wife of Ajaj Alam @ Md. Azaj Alam D/o Md. Daut Ali Resident of Mohalla-Muskipur Kothi, Jamalpur, Ward No.20, Police StationGogari, District-Khagaria. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-03-2020 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 1030C/2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 341, 447, 498A, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The allegation is regarding the petitioner herein, who is the husband of the opposite party no. 2, having tortured her on account of non-fulfillment of the demand for dowry. It appears that the present case was referred to the Patna

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64349 of 2019(3) dt.04-03-2020 2/3 High Court Mediation Centre, Patna, however, the learned Mediator has furnished a report dated 13.12.2019 whereby and whereunder it has been stated that the mediation has failed. De hors the allegations and counter allegations levelled by the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 against each other, the learned counsel for the parties agree that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs. 5,000/- per month as maintenance to the opposite party no. 2 till any maintenance proceedings are taken to its logical conclusion and in lieu thereof, the opposite party no. 2 shall not oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner herein. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned counsel for the opposite party no.

2, I deem it fit and proper to dispose of the present petition with an observation that the petitioner shall furnish an undertaking before the court of learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Complaint Case No. 1030C of 2018 that he would pay a sum of Rs. 5,000/- per month as maintenance to the opposite party no. 2 regularly without fail, as aforesaid, as also would pay a cheque of Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64349 of 2019(3) dt.04-03-2020 3/3 bail, subject to such other conditions as may be deemed fit and proper to be imposed by the learned court below. It is needless to state that the opposite party no. 2 shall furnish her account number before the learned court below in order to facilitate regular payment of the aforesaid amount of maintenance fixed in the present proceedings. The present petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U T