Sami Akhtar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.66978 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -476 Year- 2018 Thana -GOPALGANJ TOWN District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Sami Akhtar Son of Kamil Mian R/o Village-Nautan Haraiya,P.S. Uchkagaown,Distt.-Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gopalganj (Town) P.S. Case No.476 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414, 413, 420, 379, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 17 ATM cards, cash of Rs.12,000/- from his possession when he was sitting in a bolero vehicle near SBI ATM and his activities were bound to be suspicious.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the money seized by the police belongs to him and he is in custody since 18.08.2018. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and some
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66978 of 2018 (2) dt.26-11-2018 2/2 accused has already been granted regular bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.10.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No.63458 of 2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj (Town) P.S. Case No.476 of 2018, with following conditions :-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjeev/- U T