← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./72255/2023allowed

Ravishankar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-11-08Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72255 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2023 Thana- DHANARUA District- Patna ====================================================== RAVISHANKAR KUMAR Son of Chandradev Yadav @ Chandradev Prasad R/o vill - Dubhara, P.S. - Dhanarua, Distt. - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sarandha Suman For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the son of the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to old dispute. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown person. The name of the petitioner has come into light on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Prince Kumar, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. There is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72255 of 2023(2) dt.08-11-2023 2/2 general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and there is no consistent evidence has come against the petitioner to show his complicity in the present case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 21.06.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 189 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T