Kamdeo Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Dept. Of Home, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.429 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -418 Year- 1990 Thana -Phulwari District- PATNA =========================================================== Kamdeo Singh, Son of Mahodar Singh, resident of Village- Bhusaula Danapur, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Dept. of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary Dept. of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Inspector General Prison & Reform Services, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Secretary, Law Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. Additional Director General of Police Crime & investigation Dept. Bihar, Patna.

6. Director Parviksha Services Bihar, Patna.

7. The Superintendent of Police, Buxar.

8. The Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra.

9. The Jail Superintendent Central Jail, Buxar.

10. The Jail Superintendent Divisional Jail, Saran at Chapra.

11. The State Sentence Remission Board through its President/Chairman. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG 3 Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, AC to AAG 3 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN) Date: 05-05-2017 Heard parties.

Through this writ application, the petitioner seeks quashing of the decision of the State Sentence Remission Board communicated vide letter no.5015 dated 17.08.2016 by which the petitioner's request for premature release was refused on the ground that opinion of the Presiding Judge was not clear.

Mr. P.K. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General No. 3,

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.429 of 2017 dt.05-05-2017 2/2 submits that though counter affidavit has not been filed in this case, however, in view of the stand taken in Cr.W.J.C. No. 420 of 2017 by the State in its counter affidavit, this writ application can be disposed of in terms of the similar directions made therein. Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of in terms of the judgment delivered today in Cr.W.J.C. No. 420 of 2017. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) (Vikash Jain, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 18.05.2017 Transmission Date B.T/- 18.05.2017