Aditya Enterprises v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17356 of 2022 ====================================================== Aditya Enterprises through its Proprietor Dhananjay Kumar, aged about 52 years (M) S/o Late Chandeshwar Prasad, Resident at House No. 50, Road No. 21, P.S. Rajeev Nagar, Patna.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Art and Culture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Divisional Commissioner-Cum- Chairman Sri Krishna Smarak Vikash Samittee, Patna.
3.
The Collector-Cum- Chief Executive Officer Sri Krishna Smarak Vikash Samittee, Patna.
4.
The Joint Commissioner- Cum- Incharge Officer Sri Krishna Smarak Vikash Samittee, Patna.
5.
Mr. Shiv Kumar I/C Gandhi Maidan, Patna, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Patna-3 6.
Niraj Kumar Pandey, Father name not known, Resident at Indrapuri, P.S. A.N. College, District- Patna.
7.
Vikash Kumar Pandey, Father name not known, Resident at Boring Canal Road, P.S. Krishnapuri, Patna.
8.
Manoj Kumar Singh, Son of Late Fateh Bahadur Singh, Resident at House No. 11, Kedwaipuri, P.S. Kedwaipuri, District- Patna. 9.
Sanjay Singh, Son of Late Mukti Nath Singh, Resident at Saristabad Road, P.S. Gardanibagh, District- Patna.
... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Indira Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad ( Gp 14 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, the learned GP-14 appearing on behalf of the State.
2.
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and as such,
Patna High Court CWJC No.17356 of 2022(2) dt.19-08-2024 2/2 this application has become infructuous.
3.
In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. 4.
Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.
5.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Shahnawaz/- U