Ajay Ojha @ Ajay Kumar Ojha And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.16006 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHILA PS District- BUXAR ======================================================
1. Ajay Ojha @ Ajay Kumar Ojha, Son of Late Shyam Rathi Ojha,
2. Indu Ojha @ Indu Devi, Wife of Ajay Ojha,
3. Nirmal Ojha @ Nirmal Kumar Ojha, Son of Ajay Ojha,
4. Vikash Ojha @ Vikash Kumar Ojha, Son of Ajay Ojha, All are R/o Village- Chhotaka Singhanpura, P.S.- Simari, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Buxar Mahila P.S. Case No. 06 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-498A, 354,/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
It has been submitted that petitioners are father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the informant.. From the written report itself, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. . In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed it is ordered that the petitioners named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16006 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2017 2/2 from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Buxar Mahila P.S. Case No. 06 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T