Rajo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15807 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -648 Year- 2016 Thana -NAWADA District- NAWADA ====================================================== Rajo Yadav, Son of Late Kishun Yadav, Resident of Village : Hisua Tola Khairsti Bigha, P.S. Hisua, District Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh -1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Nawada Nagar P.S. Case No. 648 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 379 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the written report itself it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner on account of land dispute. It has been alleged that sale deed was not executed after receiving money by the accused persons, but no any receipt of taking money has been filed by the informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Nawada Nagar P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15807 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2017 2/2 No. 648 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T