Ram Pravesh Safi v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.16760 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2013 Thana -DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictDARBHANGA ====================================================== Ram Pravesh Safi Son of Late Lakshmi Safi, Resident of Village- Pohaddi Purvi, Mushahari, P.S. - Bahera, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Mamta Devi, Wife of Ram Pravesh Safi, D/o Kedar Rajak, Resident of Village- Pohaddi Purvi, Mushahari, P.S.- Bahera, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the State : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 11-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 18.02.2017 in connection with Complaint Case No. 90 of 2013 for the offences alleged under Sections 498A, 494 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the accusations against the petitioner are highly improbable. Petitioner's first wife, namely, Urmila Devi died after giving birth to two children and thereafter the petitioner married the complainant about 23 years ago. Again the petitioner solemnized third marriage with Ranjana Devi. It is submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to keep the complainant with due dignity and honour but she has left the house. The present complaint has been filed by the complainant who wants the entire land to be transferred in her favour even though the petitioner has already transferred more than 10 kathas of land in her favour. The petitioner has been acquitted upon compromise in the only other prior case in which he had been made accused.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16760 of 2017 (2) dt.11-04-2017 2/2
4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Benipur, District Darbhanga in connection with Complaint Case No. 90 of 2013 with the following conditions:
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T