Ramjeevan Yadav @ Ramjeevan Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64304 of 2018 ====================================================== Ramjeevan Yadav @ Ramjeevan Kumar, Son of Kameshwar Yadav, R/o of Village Maharaj Bigha, P.S. Khizar Sarai and Distt.-Gaya. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ranjeeta Devi, D/o Ratan Yadav, Resident of Village-Panchu Bigha P.S. Chandauti and Distt.-Gaya.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrendra Kumar Sinha No. 1, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 21.07.2018 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 323 and 498(A) of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. Earlier bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 50596 of 2018 order dated 20.08.2018 vide Annexure-4 to the present application with liberty to file fresh bail application before the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64304 of 2018 (2) dt.31-10-2018 2/2 learned court below. Hence, fresh application has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No. 630 of 2011.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T