Manju Urmila Devi @ Manju Devi @ Urmila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 72592 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2012 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Manju Urmila Devi @ Manju Devi @ Urmila Devi, Female, aged about 75 years, Wife of Kedar Barnwal, Resident of Village - Tarwan, P.S.- Wazirganj, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gouranga Chatterjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2.

27-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 208 of 2012 registered for the offence under Sections 304(B)/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased and an old lady, aged about 75 years, and she is in custody since 10-07-2019. He further submits that husband and father-in-law of the deceased have already been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 27-07-2016 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 9509/2016 (husband of deceased namely Binod Prasad Barnwal) and order dated 03-07-2018 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 32837 of 2018 (fatherin-law of deceased namely Kedar Prasad Barnwal).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72592 of 2019(2) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as the fact that husband & father-in-law of deceased have already been granted bail, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st A.C.J.M. at Gaya in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 208 of 2012, on the following conditions:

(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, her bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T