← Library
Patna High CourtC.R./64/2022dismissed

Gupta Thakur v. Prahlad Mehta

2025-09-12Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVISION No.64 of 2022 In CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.587 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Gupta Thakur Son of Late Basudev Thakur, Resident of Village- Bharath, P.O. Bedauli, Police Station- Amba, District- Aurangabad. 2.

Bhim Singh Son of Late Suryadeo Singh, Resident of Village- Bharath, P.O. Bedauli, Police Station- Amba, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Prahlad Mehta Son of Late Hira Mahto, Resident of Village- Kasauti, P.O.- Belauti, Police Station- Amba, District- Aurangabad. 2.

Surendra Kumar @ Surendra Prasad Son of Ram Saran Mahto, Resident of Village- Kasauti, P.O.- Belauti, Police Station- Amba, District- Aurangabad. 3.

Arvind Ram Son of Sri Lakhan Ram, Resident of Village- Kasauti, P.O.- Belauti, Police Station- Amba, District- Aurangabad. 4.

Parsuram Paswan Son of Sri Ram Krit Paswan, Resident of Village- Kasauti, P.O.- Belauti, Police Station- Amba, District- Aurangabad. 5.

The State of Bihar, through the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad.

6.

The Additional Collector, Aurangabad.

7.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Aurangabad. 8.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Aurangabad.

9.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Aurangabad. 10.

The Circle Officer, District- Aurangabad.

11.

The Block Development Officer, Kutumba, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (Gp18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-01-2024 On 06.11.2023, this case was fixed but none appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls whereas opposite party first set was in appearance. On the next date i.e. 19.12.2023, as prayed, this case was fixed for

Patna High Court C.R. No.64 of 2022(8) dt.16-01-2024 2/2 10.01.2024. Today also, adjournment is sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that arguing counsel is out of station. It is not possible to provide him further adjournment.

2. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed in default.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/sonali U