Jitendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2443 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7590 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.
Jitendra Singh son of Late Ramji Singh Resident of Village- Badahara, P.O.- Jigna Dubey (Via-Bhorey), Circle and P.S Bhorey, District- Gopalganj. 2.
Satyendra Singh son of Late Dhebar Singh Resident of Village- Badahara, P.O.- Jigna Dubey (Via-Bhorey), Circle and P.S Bhorey, District- Gopalganj. 3.
Hari Singh @ Hari Shankar Singh son of Late Pooja Singh, Resident of Village- Badahara, P.O.- Jigna Dubey (Via-Bhorey), Circle and P.S Bhorey, District- Gopalganj.
4.
Sudama Singh son of Parichhan Singh, Resident of Village- Badahara, P.O.- Jigna Dubey (Via-Bhorey), Circle and P.S Bhorey, District- Gopalganj. 5.
Israil Miyan son of Late Abdul Miyan, Resident of Village- Badahara, P.O.- Jigna Dubey (Via-Bhorey), Circle and P.S Bhorey, District- Gopalganj. 6.
Rakesh Singh son of Lalan Singh, Resident of Village- Badahara, P.O.- Jigna Dubey (Via-Bhorey), Circle and P.S Bhorey, District- Gopalganj. 7.
Satya Narayan Singh son of Late Gena Singh Resident of Village- Badahara, P.O.- Jigna Dubey (Via-Bhorey), Circle and P.S Bhorey, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, Gopalganj.
2.
The Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra.
3.
The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 4.
The Additional Collector Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. 5.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Hathua, District- Gopalganj. 6.
The Circle Officer, Bhorey, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey No.5 For the State :
Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha (Sc19) Mr. Atul Shankar, AC to SC-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 25-01-2023 The present petition has been filed for restoring a writ petition bearing CWJC No.7590 of 2018, which has stood dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 17.10.2022.
Patna High Court MJC No.2443 of 2022(2) dt.25-01-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that on account of certain difficulties, the learned counsel for the writ petitioners could not attend the court, when the case was called out, resulting in the aforesaid writ petition being dismissed for want of prosecution.
Learned counsel for the State has got no objection in case the present restoration petition is allowed. Having regard to the averments made in the present petition as also taking into account the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, I deem it fit and proper to direct for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing CWJC No.7590 of 2018 to its original file.
The petition stands allowed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U