Shahjadi Khatoon @ Shahjadi Parveen v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68678 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2022 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Shahjadi Khatoon @ Shahjadi Parveen Wife of Aslam Ansari R/o Village - Chakra, P.S. - Siwan Muffasil, District - Siwan. At present Residing at Village - Bujurg Bindusar, P.S. - Mahadeva O.P., District - Siwan 2.

Shahwaj Ansari Son of Late Sahdullah Ansari Resident of Village - Bujurg Bindusar, P.S. - Mahadeva O.P., District - Siwan. 3.

Nurun Nesha Wife of Late Sahdullah Ansari Resident of Village - Bujurg Bindusar, P.S. - Mahadeva O.P., District - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-05-2023 Heard both parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Darauli P.S. Case No. 180 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case in brief is that informant suspects that all the accused persons including petitioners committed murder of her son and threw his dead body in a pond. It is submitted that petitioners have been made accused in this case only on suspicion. Petitioner no. 1 is wife, petitioner no. 2 is brother-in-law and petitioner no. 3 mother-inlaw of the deceased. Informant is not eye-witness of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68678 of 2022(3) dt.05-05-2023 2/2 occurrence. There is no material against petitioners which show their complicity in the alleged occurrence. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

Counsel for the State however, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that deceased died at his sasural and the doctor has found external injury on the person of deceased, cause of death due to injury caused by hard and blunt substance.

Considering the facts aforesaid and gravity of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners above-named on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T