Rohit Kumar Singh @ Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69858 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2025 Thana- DUMARIAGHAT District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Rohit Kumar S/O Sashibhushan Kumar Singh R/O Village- Madhuban, P.S- Madhuban, Dist.- East Champaran. 2.

Vicky Singh S/O Vir Singh @ Bir Singh R/O Village- Narang Colony, P.SVikaspuri, Dist.- Janakpuri,Delhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manjeet Kumar Mishra, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 221 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 420 liters of foreign liquor was recovered from car. Petitioners were arrested on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69858 of 2025(4) dt.04-12-2025 2/3 the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is driver of the seized vehicle and petitioner no.2 was sitting as a passenger of the seized vehicle and they have no knowledge regarding the nature of goods kept in the vehicle. The petitioners are in custody since 31.07.2025. Petitioner no.1 has got one criminal antecedent and petitioner no.2 has got clean antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 221 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioners.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69858 of 2025(4) dt.04-12-2025 3/3 (II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) krishnakant/- U T