Bhushan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70864 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Bhushan Paswan Son of Bhikhari Paswan Resident of Village - Maharani, P.S.- Pipra, District - East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Karandeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 89, 351(2), 352, and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner caught hold of the hair of the informant, knocked her down and assaulted her with leg on her stomach. It is also alleged that the informant was pregnant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting with leg and knocking the informant down. From the perusal of the order of the Trial Court, it is clear that on the person of informant, following injuries are found:- (i) Complaint of pain over right shoulder region; (ii) Complaint of abdominal pain; (iii) Three months amenorrhea. Opinion of nature of Injury reflects that these three injuries do not disclose

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70864 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/2 any kind of injury on the person of the informant since injury Nos. 1 and 2 are complain of pain which itself is not classified as injury and injury No. 3 is description of pregnancy of the informant.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 29.06.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

6. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 187 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, East Champaran, Motihari.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Siddharth Sagar/- U