Pramod Kumar Pandey @ Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68843 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2022 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

PRAMOD KUMAR PANDEY @ PRAMOD KUMAR S/o Kameshwar Nath Pandey R/v- Pura, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna 2.

UJJWAL KUMAR PANDEY S/o Pramod Kumar Pandey R/v- Pura, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. The accused/petitioners are named in F.I.R and apprehending their arrest in connection with Barh P. S. Case No. 412 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 325, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against above named petitioners is to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68843 of 2022(2) dt.26-04-2023 2/3 assault informant and others, along with other co-accused persons, causing head and bodily injuries, having intention to cause their death, where occurrence is founded over previous enmities.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that present case is the counter of Complaint Case No. 418 (C)/2022 and apparently as per the impugned order dated 12.10.2022, no injury as alleged to be received by the informant and others during the course of occurrence. It is submitted that allegation against above named petitioners is very much general and omnibus and, moreover, both above named petitioners are men of clean antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer of bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and by taking note of nature of allegation, which is not appearing specific, where injury report is not appears to be available, let above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate1st, Barh/concerned Court, in connection with Barh P. S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68843 of 2022(2) dt.26-04-2023 3/3 No. 412 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) R.S.Sen/- U T