Manibhushan Sah @ Mani Bhushan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20669 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2017 Thana -KANHAULI District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Manibhushan Sah @ Mani Bhushan Sah, son of Vansh Lochan Sah, resident of Village- Patahi Yadu, P.S.- Patahi, District- Motihari. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahtash Ali Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kanhauli P.S.Case No.30 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Section 273 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is about recovery of 09 ltrs. of nepali liquor. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He has no criminal antecedent and remained in custody for about two months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Sitamarhi in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20669 of 2017 (2) dt.08-05-2017 2/2 connection with Kanhauli P.S.Case No.30 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U