Krishna Goswami @ Kishan Goswami v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73074 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-330 Year-2023 Thana- KAHALGAON District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Krishna Goswami @ Kishan Goswami Son of Sanjay Goswami R/o Bishanpur (Vikramshila), P.S.- Shiv Narayanpur, Dist.- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant received an information that her sister had been killed by her husband Krishna Goswami (petitioner). It is further alleged that in the night, the daughter of Putul Devi who was aged around 4 years had come weeping and stated that she had seen the petitioner beating his wife. It is further alleged that the petitioner had killed his wife.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated implicated in this case and the allegations are alleged on the statement of her child and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73074 of 2024(10) dt.01-07-2025 2/2 hence should not be believed. It has further been stated that there was no complaint of any sort earlier and as such the allegations against the petitioner is completely false. The learned counsel has lastly submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 19.03.2023.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has stated that there is an allegation upon the petitioner to kill his wife. It is further submitted that as per the report received from the learned trial Court, all the prosecution witnesses have been examined, however, an application has been given by the learned A.P.P. to examine the victim's for ends of justice.

6. Considering the aforesaid submissions made by the parties and taking account that the trial is at fag end, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of bail.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected.

8. It is expected that the trial shall expedite and complete trial within three months.

(Sourendra Pandey, J) Siwani/- U T