Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Ishwar Dayal Yadav @ Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25087 of 2017 (4) dt.20-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.25087 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2013 Thana -CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- SARAN ====================================================== Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Ishwar Dayal Yadav @ Pappu Yadav, Son of-Ramashish Yadav @ Raghunath Yadav, Resident of VillageShahpur, P.S.-Basdih Kotwali Dist.-Balia (U.P.). .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Tr. No. 677 of 2017 arising out of Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 39 of 2013, registered under Section 407/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 15.07.2016 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 19704 of 2016 by this Court and petitioner is in custody since 05.08.2015. Further submission is that while the charge has been framed on 22.03.2017, but till today not a single witness has been examined by the trial court.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25087 of 2017 (4) dt.20-09-2017 Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case and the period of custody, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Saran at Chapran, in connection with Tr. No. 677 of 2017 arising out of Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 39 of 2013. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T